Click for Change the Equation Newsletter Sign Up Click for Change the Equation Facebook PageClick for Change the Equation Twitter PageClick for Change the Equation Youtube PageClick for Change the Equation RSS FEED

New Math and Science Results: A Glass Half Full and Half Empty

New Math and Science Results: A Glass Half Full and Half Empty

Optimists and pessimists alike will find something to embrace in the results of the 2011 Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS). (The report just went public this morning.) All in all, the news about U.S. 4th and 8th graders’ math and science performance wasn’t as dire as we’ve come to expect. That said, we should beware the devil in the details. Let's not ignore our progress, but let's also acknowledge how far we still have to go.

The glass half full

First, the good news:

  • In 4th grade math, U.S. students scored significantly worse than students in only 7 countries and significantly better than students in 37. In 8th grade, we were behind 6 countries and ahead of 28. We were also in pretty good company, scoring on par with countries like Finland, England and the Netherlands, and ahead of countries like Germany, Sweden and Austria.
  • In 4th grade science, only 6 countries were significantly ahead of us and 43 significantly behind. In 8th grade, it was 8 ahead and 29 behind. Again, we outperformed quite a few developed countries.
  • U.S. students have made big gains since 1995 and (in math, at least) some gains since 2007.
  • Students in Massachusetts and Minnesota did us especially proud, placing among students in the top-scoring countries. In science, for example, Massachusetts 8th graders were second only to students in Singapore.

The glass half empty

Don’t pop the champagne just yet. There’s still more than enough to be worried about:

  • The top-scoring countries did much better than the U.S. did, even if our overall rank wasn’t so dismal. The distance between the Republic of Korea and the U.S. in 8th grade math was 104 points. That exceeds the distance between the U.S. and Jordan, which was in the bottom ten nations.
  • A far smaller share of our students scored at the “Advanced” level. In 8th grade math, for example, 7 percent of our students reached “Advanced.” Compare that to 49 percent of students in Chinese Taipei and 48 percent of students in Singapore.
  • Many of our students lost ground as they get older. On average, their scores slipped between 4th and 8th grades, and 8th graders were less likely than 4th graders to score “Advanced.” Students in the top five countries, by contrast, tended to hang on to their lofty positions as they got older.
  • U.S. students in the lowest income bracket lost the most ground, becoming less competitive with students in other nations as they moved from 4th to 8th grade.
  • The U.S. ranked near the top in gender inequality—hardly a point of pride. In science, for example, girls lagged 10 points behind boys in 4th grade and 11 points behind in 8th.

More than a horse race

So what do we make of all this? One way to use these results is to learn from the countries and schools systems that have made the greatest strides. For example, some might think those high-flying Singaporeans are just wired to be better at science than we are, but our 4th graders outperformed theirs by a pretty wide margin in 1995. Yet Singapore surged ahead a stunning 60 points in 16 years and left us in the dust.

And look at Portugal. Students in that country gained an astounding 90 points in 4th grade math and 70 in 4th grade science since 1995. What did they do to achieve this success?

And then there’s Sweden. On average, Swedish 8th graders lost 55 points in 8th grade math and 43 in 8th grade science since 1995, tumbling far down the rankings. Ouch!

If there’s any lesson in all of this, it’s that nationality is not destiny. Countries can shape their own fates. It's time to dig in to those results and figure out what we should do to shape ours.

Recent Tweets